Testimonials In Non Medical Facebook Post

Pic of keyboard with 5 star review symbls next to it

Facebook Ad Compliance Case Study – July 2025 (Redacted)

As part of a series of posts, and intended for educational purposes only, we highlight some actual posts seen and discuss the potential breaches or even best practice seen in the post. This is not intended to shame but to drive genuine improvement as we all come to grips with the new guidelines and how they build upon the existing guidelines.

Example non compliant facebook post July 10

Asset Audited: Facebook Ad (Image + Text Copy)
Date of Capture: 10 July 2025
Platform: Facebook
Content Type: Social media video still + promotional caption
Practitioner Name(s): Redacted for privacy
Services Referenced: Facials, Laser Genesis skin treatments

Key Compliance Breaches Identified:

Component

Description

Breach Type

Guideline Reference

Use of Testimonials

The post contains direct customer reviews: “I’ve been to [clinic] 3 times… 10/10 experience and results!!” and “My skin has never looked better.”

🔴 Prohibited in any form of advertising

AHPRA Guidelines for Advertising a Regulated Health Service, s.133(1)(c)

Implied Guaranteed Results

Claims like “10/10 experience and results!!” and “My skin has never looked better” create unrealistic expectations of outcomes.

🔴 Misleading or deceptive

AHPRA Advertising Guidelines s.6.2; Medical Board Code of Conduct

Promotional Language

Use of “science-backed, results-driven skincare” and “Sydney’s leading cosmetic experts” lacks substantiation and implies superiority.

🔴 Potentially deceptive / unverifiable

ACL + AHPRA Advertising s.4.1.3

Unclear Role of Health Practitioner

The practitioner is referred to as “Nurse [Name]”, which may suggest medical endorsement or regulated treatment, yet no explanation of credentials or scope is given.

🟠 Misleading if medical procedures are implied without full context

AHPRA Do’s & Don’ts for Non-Surgical Cosmetic Procedures

Lack of Disclaimers

No mention of procedure risks, individual outcomes, or regulatory restrictions (e.g. laser use, medical supervision).

🟠 Missing mandatory advertising disclaimers

AHPRA Guidelines for Non-Surgical Cosmetic Procedures (2025)

Call to Action (Book Now)

“Book Your Consultation Now” paired with results-based testimonials and persuasive visuals could be considered an inducement if not accompanied by full T&Cs.

⚠️ Risk of inducement breach

AHPRA Guidelines s.4.2 + AMA Code

Summary

This Facebook advertisement contains multiple advertising breaches under AHPRA’s National Law and TGA guidance:

  • Use of testimonials is prohibited, regardless of whether they are written or verbal, especially in paid advertising.

  • The ad creates an expectation of universal success, which is misleading.

  • Visual and textual elements suggest medical-grade treatments (Laser Genesis, “Nurse”) without proper regulatory framing, disclaimers, or risk information.

Risk Level: HIGH – This post should be removed or substantially revised immediately to avoid potential complaint, disciplinary action, or regulatory scrutiny.

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Woman thinking hard about a question with text overlay asking about when does medicla and beauty advertising collide

Beauty or Medicine? The Fine Line Every Clinic Must Understand

Even simple facial treatments must comply with AHPRA advertising laws if offered by a doctor- or nurse-led clinic. This blog unpacks the difference between beauty and medicine in clinic marketing—and the legal risks of crossing the line. A must-read for cosmetic, skin, and aesthetic practices in Australia.

Read More

Live Educational Event: AHPRA Advertising Guidelines And Your Practice

16th July 2025 – 4pm AET

Register For Zoom Event